Quote from: Bowtiesarecool on October 17, 2019, 07:24:29 PM

Quote from: Decracy on October 14, 2019, 09:31:17 PM

Quote from: CjMapope on October 14, 2019, 07:42:51 PM

So what is this, basically a Eth competitor, that wants to make its name by handling 10k TPS?
You guys do realize that its taken Eth years and probably 10,000+ coding hours to even get where it is NOW hey?
Gonna take alot of work, do you guys have a single line of code to show?
looks scammy when u have a github symbol posted but the link just redirects to your ICO website, why even include that symbol there? to trick noobs i guess
This is basically just promises and an ICO... : / (same weak money grab we see everyday)

Hello CJMapope,

We hope that you are well.

We acknowledge your freedom to express your thoughts, which is also aligned to the foundation which Decracy is based on, though, reviewing your comment, there are things that you have stated which are incorrect and in ways, inclusive of malicious design and misinformation.

Before going too far, if your message was only to be read, it, in fact, highlights assumptions, presumptions, and claims about our ecosystem and development that was never expressed by our entity or direct team. When considering this, we re-approach your thoughts to no longer be inclusive of value or base and rather re-grasp your intentions to be in opposition of genuineness, truth, and validity.

Decracy has not attached a 'GitHub' image in this post which redirects users to our webpage, it instead re-directs users to the Decracy LinkTree - as designed for a seamless user experience, nor have we stated that Decracy is constructed to be a competitor of ETH, or that we have ever addressed or thought of any individual who will view this post to be "~~noobs~~".

These are all baseless. Though when looked from the outside in, if a post like this would have not been drafted by our team, this mal act, your comment, may have been read and received with the belief that it holds weight and/or validity.

As included in the original Decracy soft-announcement post above, any individual is openly invited to view our webpage, our detailed research, and structural design of the Decracy ecosystem via the official 37-Page whitepaper, as well as, invited to visit our publicly available Decracy team profiles, which emphasize the remarkable team that Decracy is made of and the value-creating history that each hold which has directly elevated the space of blockchain.

To all reading, Decracy is very aware of the breakthroughs that we are advancing, and of the profound mission that fuels us, this is the very reason behind why we openly introduce you all to our innovation. It correlates to the revolution that we are empowering and the advancements that consequentially will positively influence each of your experiences and involvements within the field of Blockchain, Privacy, Freedom, and Equity.

Visit our webpage to learn more, follow our Twitter and Telegram to be kept informed as we continue making progress.

Decracy Team

Basically, all you're saying is read the whitepaper.
Ok, not a problem to read that. However, if Decracy has been "constructed to be a competitor of ETH" the give us the tech paper rather than the business pitch via dummy guide you guys are referring to as a WP. Ethereum famously released a technical WP that demonstrated its difference from Bitcoin and exactly how they were being implemented
Probably best to drop the ambiguity in your response too. Just KISS a reply
And let's not forget that Ethereum now has hundreds of contributors. You've got only one dev profile up

Hello Bowtiesarecool,

We acknowledge your comment.

We are beginning to visualize a pattern with there being continual claims about the core Decracy team having stated that we are "constructed to be a competitor of ETH". These words and the statement would be in no manner expressed lightly by our team, and if our team was to publicly make knowledge related to this idea available, we would do so in the fashion of an organized PR campaign that would receive specialized focus and attention from our internal marketing team.

With Decracy being in soft-announcement mode, as emphasized in Decracy's opening thread, such claim or publication would not be released, shared, or made.

It is also good to address the Ethereum whitepaper and the Gavin Wood paper that has been referenced, which, when focusing on the latter, is known to be a Yellow-Paper; a technical specification document that includes science study and development instructions on the operation of a technology, while a WhitePaper includes the vision and foundational essence of a project.

Acknowledging these consensually and widely agreed-to formats and the differences shared in both paper-types, the documented communication delivered by Decracy has been much in par with the standards that have received no objections in the field of new technology introductions.

The release of our Yellow-Paper will take place when we transition to unrestrictedly announce Decracy on a prominent scale. To enlighten those reading this, there was, at least, a 6 month time difference in the publishment of the initial Whitepaper released by Ethereum and the Yellow Paper released by Gavin Wood, which was published in Q2 2014.

Lastly, to provide clarity on our team and team structure, we currently are 9 core members. (4) are heavily focused on operation, legal, business, and growth, while (5) are focused on the construction of the ecosystem. Out of our 5 technology-oriented members, (2) are Cryptography engineers; the ability to code at a scientific-proven and elevated level, (2) are fully skilled system developers, while the last is a mathematical-cryptography scientist; focusing on the inclusion of a highly secure and innovated ecosystem.

Visit our webpage to learn more, follow our Twitter and Telegram to be kept informed as we continue making progress.

Decracy Team