Quote from: TryNinja on October 15, 2019, 07:31:22 PM

Quote from: bitmover on October 15, 2019, 07:24:08 PM

Thanks, but I prefer to use authy, which just let me install anywhere without any turn arounds.

We really need more competition in this 2ffa software market

The same could be said about Bitcoin wallets. "I prefer Blockchain.com because I can access my funds anywhere without any turn around". Yes, it's convenient, but your data is stored in a third-party server somewhere. That's why apps with a backup option exist. You export all your 2FA accounts or maybe even just write down your 2FA codes and you are done. You only trust yourself, can't lose access to your accounts and your backup can be a few flash drives.

I don't agree authy is like blockchain.com

If a hacker get access to my authy account he can't login in any account that I have.
He won't even know the logins (neither the passwords) to the websites which the 2fa is enabled.

On the other hand, if a hacker get access to a blockchain.com account, that's enough to get the funds.

In case of authy, The data stored in a third party server is just useless, while the bitcoin blockchain.com is not.

Maximum security is nice for things that need maximum security, such as money. But access to those accounts in exchanges, which shouldn't have any money in the first place, doesn't need maximum security. Actually, " oversecurity " is a problem imo.