Quote from: suchmoon on October 16, 2019, 05:02:09 AM

Quote from: be.open on October 16, 2019, 03:53:49 AM

I am ready to show my face to protect my reputation. I am ready to enter into an open dialogue. And I want to see the face of the one who judges me. How can I trust a person who hides his face? I dont think there will be any problems with this, bitcoin has a lot of evangelists all over the world and for sure one of them is on the DT list. Right? I guarantee that I will be a polite and pleasant conversationalist, it is in my interests.

Even ignoring privacy concerns, I don't think anybody would (or should) do it. It's impossible to prove that two accounts are not controlled by the same person. Even if we see two people on a video call it doesn't mean anything. You could ask someone - even your real son - to support your story but it's just not possible to actually prove it. So I don't think it's worth it for any DT member to get involved in this. They would be essentially vouching for something that they can't reliably verify.

As you can see, I simply have no chance to prove my point. That is why in a fair justice system there is a presumption of innocence and the burden of proof rests with the prosecution.

Quote from: suchmoon on October 16, 2019, 05:02:09 AM

So it really comes down to your own credibility. It looks like right now the opinions are kinda split on that. You don't seem to have any particular financial gain from this alleged sockpuppeting. If what you're saying is true you can probably earn you reputation back the hard way - by staying on the forum and contributing to it. If it's not true - I guess you'd just leave the forum or become a disgruntled troll

I believe in bitcoin and crypto, this is the future, so I'm here. And the hard way doesn't scare me - fewer competitors. The question is about the unjust punishment for an imperfect act. The issue of libel against me, which in all jurisdictions is considered a crime (and my lawyer like a hungry pitbull

). The question is the adequacy of the entire trust system, which imposes a penalty, ignoring the presumption of innocence. And these are just my personal questions.

And there is still a problem with my son. Which is very cool as a bounty hunter, and from whom his favorite toy was taken. Just see how good he is. Probably best. You as a father let this down on the brakes? As they say, "I killed for less".

This is a trifle matter, why complicate it? Even if there was a mistake (and it didnt exist), this is not a gross system violation in order to chop off in a rush. I call for prudence and everyone will benefit from this.