Really, again? Well, I will answer.

My son has a rich creative imagination and a close family relationship with me. Very gifted child. A little higher, YOSHIE confirmed that I was telling the truth.

This is my ex alt account, I made it just because I can and because I feel more power (so I called him that). For a long time it is not active and for an even longer time I do not manage it. He was hacked by social hacking, around the first quarter of 2018. I did not feel affected by the loss of control over an account that I do not need, so I did nothing. I am its creator, but this is not my alt account for a long time. If this is a problem, I think I can solve it, I know who hacked me. If not a problem, I would prefer to continue to do nothing. I don’t want to testify against my friend, he is, among other things, a cool social hacker, I do not approve of some of his methods, and he is still my friend. If you think that someone has suffered from his activities, you can conduct a separate investigation on this issue. For now he is not active on the forum for about a year.

I know that from the outside it may look like selling an account, but I didn’t. At the beginning of 2018, I was already rich enough, and I just did not need it. An indirect proof of this is the very existence of some evidence against me, creating an account for sale I would take care that they were not there. I never sold accounts, this contradicts my inner beliefs.

Perhaps this episode looks a little dubious to me. But that was after I lost control of more^power account. A stylistic and semantic expertise in the history of messages in that period will easily confirm the correctness of my words. I also want to note that I did not receive a reward for this campaign and removed my signature after one week of participation, proof. Throughout this long story of accusation against me, there is not a single victim.



Sancho18 is not my alt account, therefore, there are no violations.

I will explain an interesting nuance. The highlighted phrase can be considered an idiomatic introductory sentence. It consists of the commonly used prefix "as say" and quotation marks with quotation indicating the author, and the quote is short and easy to quote from memory. I sometimes use it in my private life, and her son has repeatedly heard from me.

If the message consisted entirely of this one phrase - this could represent some problem. But this is only the introductory part of the messages, as indicated by the tilde. The entire message is not plagiarized, even if the introductory part is formally plagiarized (without infringement of copyright).


Here you crossed the point of no return, a long chain of false conclusions brought you here. It becomes crystal clear here that this is just a vulgar vendetta. Forced personal trolling for doxxing detected. Such actions are unacceptable in a forum that respects anonymity and privacy.

Update: Evidence was here and then removed to protect my anonymity and privacy. If necessary, I can provide them again.


ps If you still have any questions, I am open for a constructive dialogue.