Quote from: Snillegutt on October 21, 2019, 02:26:35 PM

Maybe it has been posted already, but on MAs: "Could We Ever Eliminate Fossil Fuels?" he lets some idiot post:

"and IF they all are electric ones assume consumption of 48kWh per km"

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/we-can-never-eliminate-fossil-fuels/

Electric cars spend on average 0,2kWh pr km. The idiots 48 is not 240% too much, but a FACTOR of 240 times to much.

I let MA know this, in a suggestion for his blog, that the contributor was off by x240 or 24 000%.

MA did not change the article, did not apologise, he din do nuffin.

What serious guy anywhere else in the world will let a mistake this big stand next to his name, but Martin Armstrong?

So instead of cars in MAs agenda using 17169TWh, that’s 26 times more than total production of 652, with a reasonable use, 17169:240=71,5T, they use 11% of total production. It’s a lot, but its not enough for MAs agenda.

Im CALLING YOU OUT ON FAKE NEWS, MARTIN ARMSTRONG. Its right there on your blog for everyone to see.

Anyone see 48 anywhere? He must have grabbed it from where the sun dont shine. And MA is this fools loudspeaker.

https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-car

Perfect deniability by design. He does not need to change the content. Why?

Most likely he created this post to himself as he usually does.

1) These post always suit his agenda. Most often he gives himself (steals) credit for 3rd party discoveries / observations via the fake poster of the question.

2) He does not need to change anything because he can imply that the mistake is made by someone else.

3) He does not even have a basic understanding of Physics.

4) This is not the first time. He is absolutely reckless when giving Economic Advice.

5) We have to assume that this guy is a total fraud. With this assumption it is easier to see what he does.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.