Quote from: TheCryproMaster on October 22, 2019, 07:34:22 PM

Quote from: aai8161 on October 22, 2019, 10:34:13 AM

Quote from: TheCryproMaster on October 21, 2019, 09:41:13 AM

Quote from: Labrader on October 21, 2019, 08:24:05 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on October 09, 2019, 09:06:26 AM

Why were those liquidators with a bad reputation appointed anyway?

A few months ago there were a few internal documents leaked and you find the answer there: they are friends with the interim manager of the company at the time. And the interim manager at the time of the so-called "hack" is the father of one of the shareholders. The liquidation is voluntary, meaning they chose to liquidate and chose the liquidator themselves. All the pertaining documents regarding the appointment are online at the companies' house. The internal documents show the clown who was interim director pushed for liquidation immediately after the "hack", to cover their asses.

Basically they appointed their friends. And Yes, GT is a global organization, not firm. It's a partnership of local firms. The clowns handling the "liquidation" are some NZ accountants who are friends of the owners.

Intrigued, what are these leaked docs? NZ has strict laws with regard to company relationships and fiduciary duties of liquidators and clients. Any funny business GT will be hung by the balls.

According to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), New Zealand uses:
The Serious Fraud Office investigates and prosecutes serious or complex financial crime so that New Zealand is a safe place to invest and do business.
The following are most closely involved in fighting
institutions: the Serious Fraud Office (UBSSM), the Department of Justice, the Rapid Financial Information Unit (PFI) and the New Zealand Organized Financial Crime Agency (ABOFPS).
We dont want to will allow Cryptoria and liquidators with a bad reputation to rob us with impunity!
So!
I read: "A few months ago there were a few internal documents leaked and you find the answer there: they are friends with the interim manager of the company at the time.
And the interim manager at the time of the so-called "hack" is the father of one of the shareholders...................".
Where are these "internal documents"?
Publicity, Publicity and Publicity will not allow them to appropriate to rob an investor with impunity!
To begin with, we write (all together, but each for ourselves) here: https://www.sfo.govt.nz
Where are these "internal documents"?
Where are these "internal documents"?
Where are these "internal documents"?

WTF are you auditioning for the part of Bart Simpson?

We'll rely on divide and conquer?
All hat and no cattle!
Help yourself.
Make up your mind.