Quote from: JollyGood on October 24, 2019, 09:59:18 PM

Quote from: examplens on October 24, 2019, 02:55:43 PM

Quote from: Dutchytalk on October 24, 2019, 02:08:04 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on October 13, 2019, 09:24:00 AM

BEWARE OF p2pb2b AND coinsbit EXCHANGES

https://twitter.com/binance - 1 million+ followers
https://twitter.com/p2pb2b - just 33k followers
https://twitter.com/c0insbit - just 19k followers

Snip!

Ok so this proves what exactly? Binance a fully established successful exchange has more Twitter followers over these two exchanges as they should?

Proves that they are much more successful than Binance. They have a much higher trading volume of a fully established successful exchange with far fewer users. there is nothing strange to you or you just seem naive?

I find you spreading FUD to coinsbit and p2pb2b just because of a few free coins. Free, worthless airdrops serve to praise them and look away from the real problem.

That user has an ulterior motive, is definitely is not naive.

Writing the trash he did then having a referral link to p2pb2b sister scam exchange coinsbit makes some of it clear.

Well Jolly I don't know how well you can comprehend English but as far as I'm concerned I have been very direct about my opinions.

No ulterior motive just exactly what I have written but just incase you have missed my whole point I will break it down into layman's terms for you:

- Your allegations are backed with very weak evidence.

- I feel your opinion about this project is wrong.

- I agree that it is most likely the volumes are fake, but doesn't mean it's a scam project. Most if not all exchanges would buff their volumes.

- You should not make allegations without doing sufficient research to prove your opinion with some sort of comprehensive evidence.

- Your intentions might be nobel but with the amount of effort you have put into your allegations you are bound to get many of these opinions wrong. In turn you are going to do more harm then good for the crypto world over time.

- My stance is I am open to the possibility it could be a scam project as I am not naive, after doing a lot more research then you I feel that it is a lot more likely it is a legitimate project. Your are naive on the other hand with tunnel vision.

- I feel this topic needs discussing and instead of just criticism towards me why don't you do something productive and find something conclusive that proves this is a scam project.

What happened to the guy who was posting in scam projects with a banner that read something like

"BIG ALLEGATIONS REQUIRE EVEN BIGGER EVIDENCE"

Something along those lines, meaning the same thing. Because he would understand what I am saying and I'm sure he would agree that your effort on this topic you started is very poor.

Look let me help you out, here is a few links that are actually quite hard to find without putting in some sort of effort:

https://rates.guru/en/exchanger/coinsbit.pro/reviews.html

Well good chance you wrote this review as it just lists as scam without any effort, less effort then yours to be fair.

https://nomics.com/exchanges/coinsbit/reviews

This review you really should read as it will save you a lot of time. This is some very constructive criticism of the exchange with a lot of good points which I'm sure might help you find some comprehensive evidence if any actually exists. But even though he has clearly done more research then you he isn't narrow minded in his opinions like yourself.

So please find the smoking barrel I encourage you to make the effort to back your opinion and that will save me spending anymore time on this project.

As it stands there are the two links above and the scam allegations on this forum as the only information I can find against this project. Up against a lot of positive reviews and facts. Which weighing it all up I have came to the opinion that it is more then likely a legitimate project.

Let's make this clear, volume buffing is done by legitimate exchanges also. If that's the best you can find that won't change my opinion. I already believe they are over buffing their volumes and I think it's a valid tactic in this industry especially for a fresh exchange to help get them off the ground.

Of course I would rather see only legitimate volumes of every exchange but the reality is in an industry that has no governing body this will never happen and that's just reality.