Quote from: Jeansbit65 on October 25, 2019, 08:54:30 PM

Quote from: chimk on October 25, 2019, 08:38:29 PM

Quote from: Jeansbit65 on October 25, 2019, 08:29:09 PM

Quote from: WunderSchwein on October 25, 2019, 08:23:06 PM

Quote from: Jeansbit65 on October 25, 2019, 08:16:50 PM

Интересно, а можно как-нибудь восстановить старый аккаунт Мембер, который был забанен (причину так и не знаю, может дорогу кому перешёл... Roll Eyes

, просто что бы можно было из него писать сообщения и общаться, пусть там будет -100 рейтинга, этот аккаунт 17 года, знакомство с криптой, реликвия Cry

, хотелось бы его сохранить на память. Где дать клятву не использовать его в баунти или где его ещё там можно использовать Huh

В МЕТА создай апелляцию, укажи что согласен на запрет подписи, безвременно.

А есть образец, это в английской ветке правильно?

я думаю надо во первых знать причину бана. во вторых объективно оценивать шансы на востановление по апелляции. Далеко не каждого разбанят, если причина п.п. 33. Только за заслуги перед сообществом. если причина бана п.п. 25, думаю, никто не будет создавать прецедент и шансы еще меньше. ссылка на заблокированный аккаунт есть?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196016.0
Я не знаю причину бана, где смотреть тоже не знаю, я не спец.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152436.msg51404602#msg51404602
Прочитайте что пишет глобальный модератор

Quote

That's exactly what most of them do and unless they're silly and publicly link them together somehow then nobody will ever know. 99% of the time admins don't look into this sort of stuff or even ban evasion, even when there's multiple pieces of evidence tying alts together including numerous cases of ban evasion. It's why I've suggested we get rid of the rule because it's useless if it's not enforced properly or at all and losing the account is probably punishment enough in most cases. In the past I've even suggested people just create a new account once banned because I actually feel it's unfair because users who actually follow the rules and leave the forum because they've been told they can't have any more accounts whilst yet there's ban evaders who have dozens of others that are free to carry on as a normal or they just create a new one. You can even create a new account from the same connection and nothing will be done about it. So there's people who follow the rules and leave who might have just been permabanned for one copy and paste whilst there's users here with dozens of troll accounts, many already permabanned, are free to continue being a nuisance on all the others. Who is the bad guy here? The destructive troll with dozens of accounts or the guy who got banned for one case of plagiarism from years ago who creates another but won't make the same mistake again? Follow the actual rules and you should be out. Break them and you can do as you please. It's also why I think we should consider some sort of fine to get your account back, especially for the lesser cases where someone may have been banned for one or two cases of plagiarism but not be considered a 'net positive to the forum so won't be unbanned or issued a sig ban. Money can be given to charity if it's seen as a conflict of interest or the forum profiting from the banning of people.

And just for the record, I don't think people should be ban evading but it's useless when it's as simple as just creating a new account and nothing is ever looked into hence why I think we need to amend certain rules or change how ban appeals work.

В этом и заключается парадокс правил, но менять их никто не хочет