Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 27, 2019, 07:08:07 AM

Quote from: aliashraf on October 23, 2019, 06:45:48 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 23, 2019, 04:55:50 AM

OK. Then how many years away are you before publishing a whitepaper, or having a Github repo available for contributors, or a Proof of Concept?

I'm not away from anything, WE are away. I'm doing my part and will continue doing it, what's yours?

We? No. This is you until you convince the community to follow you. How do we know you're not trolling with Collaborative-POW, blockchain-sharding, and with the other "great" ideas?

See? It is your problem. You think I have an obligation to convince "the community" about my ideas being great, it is not true!

As of now, the purpose of this topic is proving the feasibility of a scalable, decentralized secure sidechain for bitcoin, better than bitcoin and denouncing claims about the existence of dilemmas and trilemmas and trade-offs.

It is not about me being or not being smart or possessing great ideas, it is about the feasibility for bitcoin to get mass-adopted. I've presented an outline for such a bitcoin and I'm ready to jump into the details if I find enough reasons for this.

Re-thinking winner-takes-all and designing an alternative PoW model is not a trivial job, it is one of the most sophisticated technologies to approach and more complicated would be presenting it to a community poisoned with false claims and political propaganda.

It is also worth mentioning that I've been presenting crucial parts of my work in this forum in the last couple of years and in some occasions you have been contributing and you just can't pretend not being aware of what I'm talking about.

In one special occasion, you started a topic asking for more information about sharding and I presented you with a very important part of my work; How it is not and should bot be considered a security/scaling trade-off, remember? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112524.msg49929370#msg49929370