Quote from: erkki12 on February 21, 2014, 06:50:05 PM

Quote from: hill on February 21, 2014, 02:12:27 PM

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

Quote

No, there is no conspiracy. Nem's whole concept is ridiculous. Even its slogan was copied from Nxt. It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement". Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated. Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

Let's not do this. UP has already shown us the direction he wants to go with this. We should respect his decision.

2cool has to state that he still wants his stake, and he gets it.

We should not let 2school put us in a place where we go against a decision that was made by leadership. We need to support UPs decision!!