Quote from: actmyname on October 30, 2019, 05:35:49 PM

Can you retrieve the specific passage of text in which h4ns lies?

Quote

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Quote from: h4ns on September 09, 2019, 06:48:42 PM

My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him 10. For the second time (September 3rd).

In the real world, the substantiation of a suspicion that something is a scam / show happens when the scam happens. Therefore, according to h4ns a scam happened September 3rd and not July 2019 as he false and misleading claims in his false and misleading scam accusation!

Despite of this, whether or not someone comitted the criminal offense of fraud is defined by the public criminal laws and not by personal and subjective opinions!

Quote from: actmyname on October 30, 2019, 05:35:49 PM

Given that you intend to win 20 000 from this, you should obviously have this evidence on-hand rather than playing this cat-and-mouse game of dodging the question.

Several opnline casino victims informed Game Protect in written form that they are misleaded to not engage Game Protect because they read on bitcointalk.org that Game Protect is a scam!

The 20,000 is not a win! It is a compensation demand for damages caused by losing potential customers!