Quote from: Lauda on October 31, 2019, 07:36:21 AM

You've asked, and I've delievered.

Quote from: theymos on October 30, 2019, 06:48:27 PM

Agreed, creating a type-1 flag for sold accounts is an appropriate usage of the system. Individual cases can be debated on their merits, though; for example, these points of view could all be defended:
- Some people think that trading an account is an inherently untrustworthy act in 100% of cases.
- Some people think that trading an account is usually untrustworthy, but is OK if it's made extremely clear that the account traded hands.
- Some people think that trading an account is OK unless active deception is used (eg. lying in order to say, "this is not a sold account").
- Some people think that a little lying is not enough for even a type-1 flag, and a flag is only merited if there's also some additional underlying shady behavior; in other words, account trading can only further degrade an existing untrustworthy act, but cannot be considered flag material in itself.

I specifically do not want to decide which of the above is correct. The flag is an appropriate usage of the system in any case, though.

Tl;dr: It is a correct use of the system to flag any sold account using flag type-1. I'll be this thread as a dumping ground for names and just use it as a reference for everything; feel free to join.

Note: Quote is clearly from my... private time... with thermos. Kiss

Let's see if laudas pal/alt account that was likely sold will get a flag.

Nutildah

http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

unless you are now claiming people can post " no longer for sale " months after the account is put up for sale and that proves it was never sold?

Then again have said previously that there is NOTHING people could say that would cause you to leave nutildah negative trust....

flag him up scumbag