Quote from: xtraelv on November 02, 2019, 04:05:20 AM

Quote from: Foxpup on November 01, 2019, 11:19:36 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 10:44:06 AM

So the challenge again bring me some members you have tagged and flagged and we will compare them to the DIRTY TURDS in the initial post and then we will conduct a public examination of your reasoning behind your actions and non actions. WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF???

We're afraid that if we point out that our sent trust feedback is public (and therefore you don't require our help to publicly examine it), you'll just accuse us of being too cowardly to cooperate with your "investigation" instead of accepting that you're just too lazy to do it yourself. After all, it's the same thing that happened when you promised to investigate our merit histories, and nothing ever came of that, did it? Roll Eyes

I feel genuinely sorry for him that he/she/they/them ( constantly refers to plural - we and us - so I am trying to be gender sensitive) is unable to understand the social constructs or how the system works.

With all the grandiosity, display of superiority, self entitlement, condescending comments towards others and obvious attention seeking it appears he/she/they/them does not really understand empathy or basic social constructs.
https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/materials/Narc.Pers.DSM.pdf

It is a classic sign of the Dunning-Kruger effect. where you simply don't understand that you lack knowledge.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 11:24:20 AM

Thanks for highlighting the problem there is no accountability

With decentralized trust - the system itself is not based on accountability to a central authority. So you are right. There is no accountability in regards to your (centralized) demands other than how you interact with the system.

There is also no accountability towards how you interact with the system other than how individuals decide how to interact with you. i.e. give negative/positive feedback, include/exclude you from their trust list or use the ignore button.

Each person gets to vote whether they trust that person or not - to exclude those they don't trust and to include those they trust - to not see feedback if you exclude them (or exclude default trust) and to see their feedback (even if not on DT) you include them.

Anyone and everyone has the ability to turn off the DT system for themselves and not participate in it.

If you don't use the system the way it was designed then you really have no mandate to criticize it.

To use a famous Satoshi quote (in a different context) to sum it up:

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

So after stomping xldivs mind into the dirt in public and pulling part all of his pathetic low functioning blathering and excuses for his friends undeniably dirty deeds and making fun of them to the degree he simply abandons them and moves to the next one.

We then offer him a challenge in public that he RUNS AWAY FROM CLAIMING HE DOES NOT WANT TO WASTE HIS TIME....hahah
He is terrified because he knows we will clearly demonstrate that although he claims the observable instances like undeniable scamming and lying, auction scamming, willful scam facilitating for payment, and undeniable trust abuse for whistle blowing....he IS WILLING to give out negative trust to NON PALS for far less. Therefore demonstrating he is clearly a DIRTY TURD HIMSELF and totally corrupt.

Come on XLdiv , you can debunk this by accepting our public challenge. We will thrash it out here and you can demonstrate your SUPERIOR knowledge and reasoning.

YES OR NO will you accept the challenge???

LOL at the obvious LIES he now seeks to divert with.

" I GENUINELY FEEL SORRY FOR THEM/HIM etc" - then proceeds with an attempted public ridicule over something that has simply been explained before and is quite simple.
I mean if you genuinely did feel sorry for a person you would immediately proceed to try in a low functioning way to take the piss, LOL.... then says we have no understanding of EMPATHY....haha is this suchmoons alt? hahahah Then wonders why we feel superior and can't help it spilling over into our posts. Please fool keep with us, we ask you only post on our threads from now on. Imagine getting you, foxy, suchmoon, tman, and the other jesters here to entertain us at will. You are a great new addition.

Next let us address the other nonsense the slobbering corrupt fool that has been demonstrated clearly to be a coward and moron tries to mislead with.

What sort of moron even comes up with the convoluted reasoning. Or devoid of all reasoning. Which we will now refer to as attempting to foxpoop us.

If you do not use a BROKEN system because it is so broken and fucked that you can NOT even use it unless the corrupt inner self elected core decide you are allowed to then you have no "mandate" to criticize it. lol then suggests how you can use it to zero effect for the fun of it. hahaha

Look moron, how many times must this be explained to you and all the other dummies in meta: there is no accountability at ALL in the systems of control except to the self elected system controllers themselves who have a vested interest in colluding so that a tiny fraction of the board continues to control paid2post, trading, other rev streams, and now volume of posts.

What could possibly go wrong?? I mean once they are entrenched they can only choose themselves to be ousted from these positions of power and are free to AS XLDIV DOES selectively enforce rules to the point where people get punished for small "suspected" infractions of the rules but GET REWARDED IF THEY ARE HIS PALS AND FELLOW DT for undeniable scamming, escrow scamming, willful and deliberate scam facilitating for pay, undeniable trust abuse to silence whistle blowers.

He says, well that because you don't understand IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK LIKE THAT ... haha. Well yes the design is fucked and according to the design it is and does work exactly like that. Brilliant I have no idea why anyone has the right to criticize it then since it is supposed to

a/ be wide open to abuse

b/ reward abuse financially

c/ reward abuse by entrenching your power to abuse more

d/ reward abuse by allowing low function slobbering bums to feel they have some value

e/ crush free speech and create echo chambers

Yes I can see that looking at the mechanisms upon which the systems of control are designed that you can conclude it is SUPPOSED to work that way. However it could just be that theymos's is experimenting with things clearly had no real expertise in, or even that he attempted something that was actually impossible on an anonymous forum.

Now read that entire post and feel free to debate it xldiv but first ACCEPT OUR PUBLIC CHALLENGE you coward or else you will be added to the list of dirty turds.

The reason you will be added is this : You are trying to claim that undeniable scamming, willful and deliberate scam facilitating for pay, undeniable trust abuse and attempting to punish people for whistle blowing and other such things are NOT Financially high risk and therefore you yourself are a financial danger to this forum. Being on DT is also a position someone with those views should certainly not have.

WILL YOU ACCEPT THE PUBLIC CHALLENGE YES OR NO coward.

The others like nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0 et al will obviously try to derail with any excuse.