Quote from: bitmover on November 02, 2019, 01:50:54 PM

About Chipmixer campaign, in my opinion it is a huge success. It is certainly very expensive: this week payments costed 1.3 BTC for 60 members.

The total cost of Yobit/Cryptotalk campaign is, according to my estimations, 200*0.008 = 1.6 BTC per week.
But let's suppose it is the same as chipmixer, 1.3.

They could have spent the same amount of money and made a very nice campaign, with reputable members wearing their brand while supporting newbies and advanced users, instead of spamming around.

Why did they prefer this crazy campaign format? What am I missing?
50 good members posting 30 posts per week is much better than 500 spammers spamming 70 posts per week, isnt it?

well do the math---yobit is getting tens of thousands more posts each week for the same price. that's a hell of a lot of backlinks for google.

they're obviously aiming at a very different demographic than chipmixer too. their ads are literally aimed at low level spammers, who they are trying to recruit on their site. chipmixer, on the other hand, is trying to establish a reputable brand.