Quote from: LoyceV on November 02, 2019, 07:47:46 PM

Quote from: Steamtyme on November 02, 2019, 07:41:56 PM

I would have to go look through their feedback and what not, but it might still be valuable enough to deserve to be included within someone's trust list.

The first one has left a lot of positive feedback. The other 3 haven't left any feedback at all. Those last 3 aren't really a problem for the Trust system, but it's not helping either.

Yeah I looked it over quickly I agree with you, looks like the first is an older account that was involved in group buys or something while older feedback is still relevant, there's nothing there that seems to be enough to need them on a trust list. The other three don't have any value for the system overall and if they were their based on their judgement in posting and advice, they can't do it anymore so are doing nothing, apart from potentially filling a spot on the 10 required for a personal trust list.

I was more making a general comment that there could be cases where banned doesn't mean poor judgement in regards to feedback.

Quote from: DiamondCardz on November 02, 2019, 07:56:37 PM

I think it's more important to make clear my thoughts on people using the trust system for things such as "I disagree with what this person says".

Agreed, It's definitely best to make a list that represents your judgement rather than worrying about remaining or earning a spot on DT.

Quote from: Lauda on November 02, 2019, 08:15:35 PM

Wouldn't a simple solution to this be that if you're banned you're no longer eligible for DT1 and DT2?

Could be, then the users who agree with ratings just have to go back and duplicate the feedback they deem relevant. It would probably have to become a larger issue than it currently is before anything like that happens