Quote from: game-protect on November 04, 2019, 08:43:36 PM

Quote from: Initscri on November 04, 2019, 08:41:22 PM

Quote from: game-protect on November 04, 2019, 08:40:29 PM

Quote from: Initscri on November 04, 2019, 06:59:26 PM

Quote from: game-protect on November 04, 2019, 04:24:56 PM

Quote from: Initscri on November 04, 2019, 03:22:57 PM

Quote from: game-protect on November 04, 2019, 12:03:32 PM

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, Astargath, Avirunes, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Please show the written contract?

Quote

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Your emails are a legally binding contract.

Your email exchange with h4ns satisfies all legal requirements for it to be considered a legally binding contract within the eyes of the law.

The theme is written contract and not "legally binding agreements"! Roll Eyes

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world! Roll Eyes

Please show the judgement by a real world court that my emails are a legally binding agreement Huh

Are you actually serious. I just did in the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.msg52971823#msg52971823

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

Do you suffer a brain deadness in the highest possible degree?

Neither Golden Ocean Group Ltd nor Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd is Game Protect! Roll Eyes

I asked you to show me the judgement by a real world court where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a legally binding aghreement?

OMG LMAO.

Alright man, go to court and see for yourself

Ok, give me the reference number for the judgement by a real world court that the emails Game Protect sends are are written contract?

Well, buddy, you see, the way the court system works is that in order for there to be a reference number there actually has to be a case with you involved.

Because you're a fake lawyer, I don't think that'll ever be the case.

However, the way laws are often defined for society is by high court judgements (in the UK for example) where-by other judges can take those cases by example. You'd know this if you weren't a fraud

Quote from: actmyname on November 04, 2019, 08:44:56 PM

Reminder: this deflection hinges not on the actual substance of the flag but rather is an argument of semantics.

Pragmatically meaningless.

Correct, he's over analyzing verbiage from the site. Meaningless.

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns. Contract or no contract.