Quote from: game-protect on November 04, 2019, 08:58:26 PM

Quote from: Initscri on November 04, 2019, 08:46:26 PM

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns.

At what day and how did the scam happen?

Quote from: Initscri on November 04, 2019, 08:46:26 PM

Contract or no contract.

Killed or not killed, it does not matter, he is a killer, period! Cheesy

Please show the written contract?

Quote

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: Initscri

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, so by publicly stated and applicable laws you are obligated to show this written contract, otherwise you commit the criminal offense of intentionally participating in a public defamation campaign!

I have already stated that the email exchanges displayed by h4ns are your written contract.

If you don't believe me, fine. But that, according to the law, is valued as your written contract/agreement.

Quote from: actmyname on November 04, 2019, 09:02:03 PM

There are two paths that we can foresee:

1) referencing the thread -> deflection -> tirade about a different subject -> "please show the written contract"
2) changing to a different topic -> deflection -> "please show the written contract"

But this is a false dichotomy.

3) refusing to humor game-protect -> end

Right, I'm not humouring the "contract" thing anymore. Although, I don't know if refusing to humour him will work.

I tried that before (quite a long time ago, months and months back). I stopped responding. He kept posting, and someone got scammed. So I'm unsure if keeping the spotlight on him and his stupidity is a bad thing, because letting him stagnate and speak to himself kind of pushes back the criticism further back into the thread, making it easier for people to not be aware.