Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son

This is an actual subpoena: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/(70)%20Chaffetz%20Subpoena%20to%20Pagliano%2009-16-2016.pdf

This is NOT a subpoena: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20State%20re%20Document%20Subpoena.pdf

here are the requirements for a subpoena to be actionable: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_45

Quote from: TwitchySeal on November 07, 2019, 09:28:47 AM

Check out the Subpoena Schiff sent Esper: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2019-10-07.eec_engel_schiff_to_esper-dod_re_subpoena.pdf

https://i.gyazo.com/6883d8d48729a8f12ccff4514883f575.png

This is not a subpoena. See links above for why.

Yeah we get it. This is not a subpoena either: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20

It doesn't mean they didn't send an actual subpoena.

Great. Document the ACTUAL subpoena then if it exists. Enjoy your snipe hunt.

You really going to go with the "if the subpoena isn't on the internet then it must not exist" theory?

Who got it into your head that the cover letter for the subpoena was proof the subpoena wasn't an actual subpoena?