Quote from: janggernaut on November 07, 2019, 12:00:46 PM

Quote from: bering on November 07, 2019, 06:33:01 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 08:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 01:34:37 PM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

I don't think i ever seen people betting on 2x payout while they are trying to win wagering contest. How could you so sure you can wager much more than on highest win chance? I believe 9 of 10 people who trying to win wager contest must be use high winning chance to avoid get lose streak while they betting.

I did it several times already, I did not even use the highest winning chance when I participated in a wagering contest.
Simply because I have tried using high winning chance but failed earlier because getting many losing bets.
Mathematically if we use high winning chance, then we need to have so many winning bets to recover 1 lose bet.
Obviously there is no guarantees that we will be able to wager more by using specific strategy as everything based on our luck.
It is just about preferences, every players has their own strategy and has their own luck.