Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son

I see lots of presumptions, assumptions, and beliefs, but just because the Subpoena isn't on the internet is not proof that it doesn't exist.

You mean like the presumption that the subpoena exists? I mean if it exists, surely you can find a case file or some kind of court document reference number when it was filed surely? No, this is a super top secret subpoena that no one gets to see even though by definition it is a court document of public record. Just admit you have no evidence of it ever existing.

I can do one better. Here's the subpoena letter that was sent with the Subpoena. It explains the scope of the subpoena: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20State%20re%20Document%20Subpoena.pdf

This is an actual subpoena: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/(70)%20Chaffetz%20Subpoena%20to%20Pagliano%2009-16-2016.pdf

This is NOT a subpoena: https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20State%20re%20Document%20Subpoena.pdf

here are the requirements for a subpoena to be actionable: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_45

Quote from: TwitchySeal on Today at 04:28:47 AM
"Check out the Subpoena Schiff sent Esper: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2019-10-07.eec_engel_schiff_to_esper-dod_re_subpoena.pdf

https://i.gyazo.com/6883d8d48729a8f12ccff4514883f575.png"

This is not a subpoena. See links above for why.

EDIT:

I found another document with as much legal authority as the one you just provided: https://i.imgur.com/3c1jojN.png

It also explains the scope of the subpeenor, so of course the subpeenor is real.

Just admit it, the subpoena never existed and you got lied to.