Quote from: TwitchySeal on November 08, 2019, 05:02:58 AM

No, that's not what he's saying lol. He's saying they sent a subpoena that wasn't properly authorized. You're saying they didn't send a subpoena at all.

LOL

look at me deny reality, just LOL!

ROFLMACOPTOR!!1

Question: What is the legal status of an improperly authorized subpoena?
Answer: A request for information.

A subpoena is a narrowly defined legal document that carries a penalty and is a matter of public record.

Lets review this subpoena: https://i.imgur.com/3c1jojN.png

As you can see this subpoena defines the scope of the subpeenor. Now, I have produced my subpoena. What in this document makes it a legally actionable subpoena? Now see I call it a subpoena, so clearly by virtue of government magic it is one because I called it that.

Why can't you produce the subpoena?

EDIT:

Hey look whats under the "letters" section.

https://oversight.house.gov/letters

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20State%20re%20Document%20Subpoena.pdf

You would think they would put that in the "Hearings" section or something wouldn't you if it was a subpoena?