Quote from: YOSHIE on November 08, 2019, 02:25:50 PM

Quote from: KTChampions on November 08, 2019, 12:12:28 PM

the current owner did not commit a corresponding violation of the rules of the forum.

Let's see, to these two accounts @ Incognito01, @NUKA.
~

You are right, the violation in the form of bounty cheating is obvious and for this violation these accounts must be tagged. I meant something else - NUKA did not commit (seemingly) violations that would lead him to the ban.

Quote from: Avirunes on November 08, 2019, 03:35:44 PM

Quote from: KTChampions on November 08, 2019, 12:12:28 PM

I agree with you.
But now the question arises - should the account (Incognito01) that changed the owner be banned? After all, the current owner did not commit a corresponding violation of the rules of the forum.

Yes he should be since he is related with all the accounts in Case 1 as you've mentioned and one of them is banned but then again depends on how much mods are convinced with the proof of connection of those accounts since spreadsheets forms are open and anyone can fill them so there is no surety that the actual owner filled that.

As for google tables, they are from official sources and they are read only:
✅[BOUNTY]💰💰[FINANCEX EXCHANGE]💰💰 - EXCHANGE MADE SIMPLE (8,5M REWARD)✅
http://archive.md/gW6JQ

[BOUNTY] arawtoken.io - Phase 1 Completed - Phase 2 - $500K in Rewards
http://archive.md/p2kLJ

[BOUNTY][PRE-ICO+ICO] 🔴🔴🔴 SETHER 🔴🔴🔴 SETH Bounty Campaign
http://archive.md/3MbwC

[BOUNTY]WORLDEX- SOFTCAP ALMOST REACHED- 400,000 WDX!
http://archive.md/OgJ9Q

Only Ax1 spreadsheet was found through a search, but it is logical that Ekaterinat has a Ekaterina T telegram.

As for the ban evasion it is difficult case. If Incognito01 account did not evade the ban and was sold, and after that became active, then theres nothing to ban it. This is if we reason formally. I think that an explanation of the moderators is needed here.
Maybe its worth clarifying this question in Meta? Not regarding this case, but in general.