Quote from: xtraelv on November 09, 2019, 04:12:01 AM

Quote from: nutildah on November 09, 2019, 02:02:00 AM

Haha,

I think you missed this part

Quote from: xtraelv on November 08, 2019, 10:38:10 PM

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on November 09, 2019, 01:38:13 AM

Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv? is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..

Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.

Yep, asking if someone jumbled their username letters and clearly demonstrating they don't know what your name is a failed attempt to doxxx them haha
Then xldiv says: when you have forced me to clearly demonstrate that I xtraelv :

1. am undeniably a supporter of undeniable scammers
2. I reward undeniable scammers
3. I will present hilarious excuses to protect my undeniable scamming pals and place at high financial risk the rest of the forum
4. I am therefore undeniably financially high risk myself.
5. I will seek to derial, divert and side track to off topic garbage to attempt to discredit observable instance that can not be discredited
6. I will make ludicrous statements regarding other members that are perhaps among the observably most net positive in terms of fighting scams, giving tips that made more millionaires, and fighting for transparent rules/standards that ensure the fair treatment of all members, who have zero instances of financially motivated wrong doing in their entire history.

7.will claim that my speculations on non financially high risk issues are facts but then claim others undeniable observable instances demonstrating undeniable scamming are ......well I will just make excuses and in public refuse to answer yes or no. Looking extremely shady in light of the scammers themselves do not even deny it.

8. Will claim that identifying something you have already said you clearly intend to do is clear evidence you really did intend to do it.

then this means you are REKT.

This may seem by the scammers themselves as if you are trying to assist us in punishing them via dragging them and causing us to examine their undeniable scamming actions over and over. The hilarious excuses and crazy accusations are an attempt to demonstrate the scamming is impossible to defend and even attempting to do so is humiliating to the excuse provider and insulting to the reader.

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

We decided to try and understand you and though thought process a little more.

https://www.understood.org/en/learning-thinking-differences/child-learning-disabilities/dyslexia/skills-that-can-be-affected-by-dyslexia

Dyslexia doesnt only affect reading. It can make a lot of things hard for kids and adults. Here are some of the other skills and behaviors dyslexia can affectsome of which may surprise you.

Understand and follow directions

Repeat something in the right order

Remember words, phrases, names, and directions

Find the right word to say

Pronounce words the right way

Tell the difference between words that sound similar

Learn and use new words

Spell and use grammar the right way

Rhyme

Stay on topic

Understand jokes, puns, and sarcasm

Speak or read out loud with confidence

Sound out and pronounce words while reading

Get and stay interested in stories and books

Understand whats read

Understand word problems in math

Write letters, numbers, and symbols in the right order

Express ideas in an organized way

Listen and take notes

Interpret body language and other social cues

Make and keep friends

Express feelings appropriately

Tell left from right

Build self-esteem

I mean these ( the red ones) certainly could be having a serious effect on your ability to hold a sensible and credible debate.

This is not something that we should really be capitalizing on even if it is punishing the scammers you are seeking to defend and reward or perhaps you are not intending on doing that at all( i mean you may not be deliberately high risk you may just be very befuddled and being used unfairly as a useful idiot by both sides)

You need to think it all over again, and perhaps even ask someone else to go through it all with you to make sure you are presenting yourself as you really wish to be seen.

No need to rush. We are not going to abandon you at this stage, don't worry.

You need to seriously consider this is all being documented and will remain here in history perhaps for quite a while.

It is never too late to repent and do the right thing. If you quit defending scammers at this point I see no further need for us to be working against each other. I do see you have put some work into finding other REAL scammers. I do not say you are entirely rotten like some members here. HOWEVER you can not support UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS. Please do not reply and DO NOT RUSH into keeping this going unless you really believe that defending undeniable scammers is the correct thing to do.

We are ready to be civil and fair (well we have always been fair) with you BUT you need to be sensible and accept that this is auction scamming and that anyone else would have red and not be on DT, especially when you couple this will ALL the other evidence of supporting other undeniable scammers and trust abuse.

Get on the correct side of this because this is all public and on record. You can not present any credible case to explain his deliberate deception for clear and direct financial gain in any other terms other than scamming. That is exactly what scamming is.

Let's just agree it observably meets the universally accepted definition of scamming and is clear scamming for financial gain. Even alone this is NOT the acceptable behavior of a default trust member.