That would be the logical thing to do seeing as how Pompeo said he received the subpoena:
https://i.imgur.com/P53g4Nh.pngOf course concluding these subpoenas never existed is an irrational response to the inability to produce these subpoenas right? Of course!
Given that Pompeo acknowledged receiving the subpoena, yes, saying it doesn't exist is an irrational response.
Stop ferreting your way around my questions.
I have always answered all your questions. Now simply answer mine: why would Mike Pompeo say he received a subpoena if it didn't exist?
https://i.imgur.com/P53g4Nh.pngSo Mike Pompeo is the official guy who decides of subpoenas are real now huh? Interesting. I thought that was what courts of public record did, but this is news to me. If Mike Pompeo acknowledged Bigfoot, would saying Bigfoot doesn't exist be an irrational response? You don't answer my questions, you answer the questions you wish I had asked.
