Quote from: TECSHARE on November 12, 2019, 08:11:52 AM

Quote from: nutildah on November 12, 2019, 08:06:44 AM

You're the one who thinks the subpoena doesn't exist, that's why I'm asking you.

Obviously he did receive a subpoena. So did Pompeo. If they hadn't, they wouldn't have used the word "subpoena" in their letters to congress.

You're the one that thinks the subpoena exists, that's why I am asking you. Obviously this is not evidence the subpoenas ever existed. Neither is Pompeo. Of course this is all court admissible documentation right? Oh yeah hearsay is not admissible.

This isn't a court room. If you really are stupid enough to think that both Pompeo and Giuliani are either lying or mistaken about receiving a subpoena, that's on you. However, I don't think you are actually that stupid. I think you are just being dishonest so you can weasel your way out of having to admit you were wrong, as is your MO.

Edit: here is the subpoena letter and schedule accompanying Giuliani's subpoena:

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/20190930%20-%20Giuliani%20HPSCI%20Subpoena%20Letter.pdf

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/201900930%20-%20Giuliani%20HPSCI%20Subpoena%20Schedule%20Only.pdf

I'll save you the trouble of having to respond.

TECHOLE: "Derp, that's still not the subpoena."