Quote from: Viper1 on November 14, 2019, 03:19:02 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on November 14, 2019, 03:15:18 AM

Quote from: Viper1 on November 14, 2019, 03:13:40 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on November 14, 2019, 03:10:35 AM

What do you think Viper1, what does "clerk" mean?

I know exactly who it is. You don't as you didn't do the research which was clear from you throwing out court of law references for congressional subpoenas.

Then tell me, what is "clerk", and what is their job?

I have said on multiple occasions I'm not going to hold your hand. I asked you to prove your points by providing information from actual government documents and you said you wouldn't. And now you're trying to get me to do it for you. No. I spent hours pouring over documents. Do your own research. I can only assume based on your refusal to take action and prove your points that you have zero interest in the truth about any of this.

Quote from: Viper1 on November 14, 2019, 03:22:58 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on November 14, 2019, 02:37:56 AM

Your concept of burden of proof is so twisted I am not sure what the point is.

I'm going to say this one more time. The burden of proof is yours. So prove it.

Quote

Burden of Proof
A fallacy is when someone makes an argument based on unsound reasoning. Burden of proof is one type of fallacy in which someone makes a claim, but puts the burden of proof onto the other side. For example, a person makes a claim. Another person refutes the claim, and the first person asks them to prove that the claim is not true. In a logical argument, if someone states a claim, it is up to that person to prove the truth of his or her claim.

Quote

A negative claim is a colloquialism for an affirmative claim that asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something. The difference with a positive claim is that it takes only a single example to demonstrate such a positive assertion ("there is a chair in this room," requires pointing to a single chair), while the inability to give examples demonstrates that the speaker has not yet found or noticed examples rather than demonstrates that no examples exist (the negative claim that a species is extinct may be disproved by a single surviving example or proven with omniscience). The argument from ignorance is a logical fallacy. There can be multiple claims within a debate. Nevertheless, it has been said whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim.

All your dancing around is nothing more than that. The burden of proof is yours as you can provide it but refuse to.

So you think I should prove that subpoenas that I don't think exist, don't exist? Also, what does a clerk do?