Be prepared for him to shift the argument to something else at this point.
He said as he shifts the point. How is this for not shifting the point. When will you produce the subpoenas Nutilduhh?
I'm still stuck on how his brain somehow thinks that the [ existence of an investigation into Bidens son ] and the fact that [ Biden pressured Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son ] are not 'mutually exclusive'. Maybe he just confused about what mutually exclusive means?
What?
That's simply not true. A "court of record" has the power to fine or imprison. Guess who else does? Congress, even though they haven't actually done it for almost a century. There is no court involved with the issuing of a congressional subpoena.
That is the clerks job, as described above to file, keep, and attest to the record.
A "permanent set of the books and documents generated by the House" is not the same thing as a court.
Where are the subpoenas Nutilduhh?
We've told you several times already: they are not publicly available as of yet.
https://www.justsecurity.org/67076/public-document-clearinghouse-ukraine-impeachment-inquiry/Just Security has compiled and curated all publicly available documents in Congresss impeachment inquiry concerning President Donald Trump in connection with Ukraine. This collection seeks to include significant original source material, including relevant legislation, letters, subpoenas, deposition transcripts, executive branch communications, and litigation documents.
Anything else?
I am not confusing anything. In order for a subpoena to have legal force it must be filed with a court of record and made public, as well as personally served to the person required to comply with it. Without these steps it is just a request for information and not a subpoena. Yes, one more thing.
When will you produce the subpoenas Nutilduhhh?