Quote from: CryptoSparks on November 14, 2019, 12:16:35 PM

Quote from: TMAN on November 14, 2019, 10:52:16 AM

Quote from: CryptoSparks on November 14, 2019, 08:12:55 AM

Welcome in the roasting show mate

1) I am not your mate
2) This is the retarded CryptoSharks show not a roasting show
3) Fuck off you retarded Pajeet

Oh i see only now you're also promoting the stupidest bot in circulation, Gunbot Grin

I guess the one that needs to fuck off is not me but you that joined a war you cannot win, keep insulting as much you like ~~MATE~~ LEGENDARY SELF MADE MAN!! ( what an achievement in life, congrats, did you update the curriculum already?)

Yes, you are fighting with some of the most foolish and clearly double standards deceptive members here. Tman for example is an undeniable auction scammer, self confessed trust abuser, implicated in extortion schemes and yet all his pals here including nutildah a self confessed scam facilitator are here to punish you for making what they insist are false claims.

This is the issue with this forum. You can not have people that are confirmed scammers and willing scam facilitators for pay punishing others it simply does NOT WORK.

I mean in the context of their own actions nobody would claim your actions should have a red tag or flag. However if they were all squeaky clean and the context was that ANY ACTIONS that could be demonstrated as PROBABLE high risk could get a warning then that would just be how it is.

The onus on them would be to demonstrate how probable the high risk would be. Cases like this are kind of impossible to prove because you could have huge reserves of your own to make sure guarantees. The point about conflating bitcoin key with this api key could simply be adapted on your part for extra clarity to the investors if they wished.

This is the problem with the trust system ONLY type 2 flags and above have any kind of objective standards that must be met. The rest is just down right now to the discretion of a bunch of undeniable scammers and scumbags who's own actions introduce a context of acceptable behavior that makes pretty much anything acceptable. On top of that their discretion is dependent upon their own reliance of income from competing projects. The entire thing is broken below type 2 flags.

So there is nothing you can do at all except point out the double standards here and hope for objective standards be introduced for the entire trust system. Even though should that be introduced I think the standards will always be developed that demonstrate a warning could be sensible for claims of huge % returns that are guaranteed.

I think a slight rewording and removing any guarantees ( although you may have reserves to make those) and a slight tweak to the description of bitcoin key /api key thing and THEY would have NO grounds to put warnings on your project.

Something like: based on past trades we think it is likely you will get x returns in future but no guarantees.
and the bitcoin/api key specifics drilled down on

Then you can certainly ask for the red and flags to be taken down. I would rather you blast them for their double standards and clear personal scamming, but that probably will not immediately or even long term be best in your specific case.

Even without guarantees most people are so hopeless at trading they will likely put a little bit with you to see if they can get some returns anyway.

Just read all of that and if you see clear issues then bring them up. I am simply saying what I think is best for you at this point and those that will use your bot. I think the results look interesting. I prefer to do research based trading myself after talking with the dev teams but that is time consuming and you need to be friends with several developers to get some kind of useful feedback to compare. These bots may be using some kind of system to gain % that I have no understanding of, so I don't know how successful they can be longterm.