Quote from: biddicoin on November 16, 2019, 04:07:20 PM

I just wanna criticize this survey:

1 how do you determine population and sample? or you just wanna take all population without considering respondent background, it looks like weird

2 the questionnaire is weird too, it cant select more than one response per column

that is enough to make this isn't scientific

I will attempt not to make any snide remarks here.. Though that last sentence makes me shudder.

1; The chosen sample group is crypto investors. Not "all population".

2; The reason you can only select one priority in each column is to force you to rank the factors amongst themselves. If you could select "most important" for all answers it would make very little sense.

Overall I would agree and say this survey does not live up to a peer reviewed scientific survey made for a doctorate or similar. But this is not the point of the survey, rather the aim is commercial and as such not focused on the scientific community. Further it was constructed by a person (not me) that has a good understanding and experience in user data collection.

We welcome all replies and (sensible) criticism.