Quote from: BADecker on November 18, 2019, 04:08:44 PM

Quote from: styca on November 18, 2019, 06:31:52 AM

Quote from: BADecker on November 14, 2019, 08:59:03 PM

If you don't understand that gravity is a work of God, you don't really understand about gravity.

There is no evidence for God!!!

Quote from: BADecker on November 14, 2019, 08:59:03 PM

gravity does what it does without having any gravity theory involved. People who are affected by gravity, and want to call the affect "gravity," don't need to understand gravity theory to know that it's gravity.

True. But a benefit of having the scientific explanation is that science advances. If we just relied on the stuff that we can physically witness, without trying to understand what it is and how it works, we'd still be living in caves.

Quote from: BADecker on November 14, 2019, 08:59:03 PM

Engineers using physics doesn't have anything to do with engineering. We all use physics all the time for everything that we do. Or do you think that if we aren't engineers, or that engineers themselves, suddenly stop using the physics of the universe? Maybe at death. Is that what you are talking about?

Not sure what you're suggesting. Engineers use physics (and the laws of physics), yes.

Everybody uses physics. Engineers aren't some special class of people who use physics while the rest of the people don't. So, why pick on them or physicists?

There is no proof that science advances with scientific explanations. Why? Because some of the explanations are wrong. And because they are wrong, they get in the way of continued exploration and advancing that would have been done by scientists who believe the wrong explanations, and quit exploration because of it. So, scientific advancements are often more like religion than science.

Search here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0 and you will find the proof that God exists... if you happen to be enough of a scientist that you know how to apply scientific proof.

Cool

MRCA is used in reference to the ancestry of haplotypes rather than organisms. The people who wrote your proof #65 completely ignored the fact that humans share 4% of Neanderthal DNA. MRCA for Homo Sapiens lineage is estimated to be around 200,000 years old. LUCA is estimated to have lived 3.5 to 3.8 billions years ago.

The person who wrote this 'proof' knew diddly squat about human evolution.

Learn a bit more about speciation so that you can read such 'proofs' and understand what you are reading.