Quote from: eddie13 on November 19, 2019, 03:02:36 AM

So he did accuse, then deleted it?
Do you think LoyceV's glowing post logger bot caught it? LoyceV?
I don't know how to work that thing.. Professional witness to the stand?

Not sure what you're asking - the edited-out part was quoted here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg53095255#msg53095255

If you're looking for OgNasty saying "ibminer stole a miner" - no, of course he didn't say THAT. But this is also not true by any reasonable interpretation of "moving forward":

Quote from: OgNasty on November 18, 2019, 10:19:28 PM

I asked ibminer a question he responded to and we moved forward.

"Sorry, my mistake" would be moving forward. Deleting the "question" and then pretending that I'm the one suspecting ibminer... well, that's classic Og move.

Quote from: eddie13 on November 19, 2019, 03:02:36 AM

Yeah, it's "weak sauce" untill I see it..
I trust you to not lie to me but I don't even really understand what you mean about some accusation with a "?"..
I believe he edited his post a lot because I do too.. I might edit my posts 5 times in the first minute or so after hitting posts the first time, heh..
Sticky spacebars n such..

Would you believe a sticky spacebar made me post this:

eddie13, are you the guy who stole Og's miner and fucked his goat? Don't fault me for seeking some clarity here. I'll delete this if you try asking about it.

I mean, yeah shit happens, but how do you make up something completely stupidly false out of the blue like that? Tends to happen with OgNasty a lot. User posts in his thread - tag as a sold account, user proves it's not sold - make up a litany of other crimes (eoakland). User points out an ambiguity in Og's post - tag him for an accusation, and for "hiding" behind a publicly known alt (minifrij). Just scraping the surface here. He's not tagging anymore for that kind of shit but hasn't removed the old frivolous tags either.

Quote from: eddie13 on November 19, 2019, 03:02:36 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on November 19, 2019, 02:18:09 AM

He used to post red trust with that "weak sauce" when he was in DT and his victims were not. Thankfully that doesn't quite work these days.

True, he may have been a bit heavy handed back then against some he personally didn't trust/like but things were stricter back then and with a bit different code of conduct..
DT1s and DT2s get away with a lot today they wouldn't have back then.. Now it's a lot of "I stopped so many scams and spam I deserve to get away with xxx" (virtue signaling), so no consequences for bad actions for anyone with half a decent reputation.. If you leave a whole lot of correct feedback then your feedback is worth more than booting you for whatever stupid shit you did..
(Not "you" but just like in general, I'm bad at the "you" thing)
Back then saying anything false would get someone red trust.. Their are more checks and balances these days but most up-and-coomers are more liberal so there have the standards gone..

Well, see above. There was nothing at all false or suspicious deserving red trust in some of those disputes. Although if I wanted I'm pretty sure I could find an excuse or two for every instance of questionable judgement by OgNasty, and I probably did back in the day when I still trusted him, but at some point you gotta admit it's not just coincidences anymore.