The table and chart on the first page are relevant now.
satoshi is the leader of this TOP-200 again.
Since I did not update this thread in the previous month, I published monthly statistics for September and October 2019.
Perhaps such users wait for the best time to give their sMerits away. For example, I noticed that Veleor who had about 289 sMerits has distributed many merits recently and now has only 59 sMerits. He looks generous!
This line is incorrect because the list sorted out by total accumulated sMerits, not total earned sMerits.
You're right. I changed the heading for the 5th column but forgot to edit the title of the list. I corrected two of my last posts.
satoshi is the leader of this TOP-200 again.
Since I did not update this thread in the previous month, I published monthly statistics for September and October 2019.
You got that right and those we should stop sending smerit to because all they do is hoarding the smerits😁.
/Joking
Took me quite some time to understand the list too but seriously, those repeating names making the list almost every month what's there deal they don't encounter meritable posts or just greedy. 🤔
/Joking
Took me quite some time to understand the list too but seriously, those repeating names making the list almost every month what's there deal they don't encounter meritable posts or just greedy. 🤔
Perhaps such users wait for the best time to give their sMerits away. For example, I noticed that Veleor who had about 289 sMerits has distributed many merits recently and now has only 59 sMerits. He looks generous!
Members who earned a lot of sMerits (in October 2019)
You're right. I changed the heading for the 5th column but forgot to edit the title of the list. I corrected two of my last posts.
I think the best heading for the last column would be "accumulated sMerits" because this index represents how many additional sMerits a user has put into his/her own stash for a month. But the term "Earned sMerits" is also understandable.