Crypto-Info and the whole community:

We can't really understand if you are lazy to look up the messages or you don't have the skills to do it. We already answered about the white paper issue and all your accusations, but we'll give you a resume here so you can look up for the full messages about this:

You understood that we talked about an already regulated token, when we clearly expressed by all ways that the BHF-TOKEN was not regulated and the yet to exist BHM-TOKEN will be regulated. As every project of this characteristics, that obviously you don't know about enough to understand, we talked in future and we presented it as what we intend this to become. And we are doing it as you could and can see in the roadmap.

Moreover, as every project, we have the total right and natural process of adapting the steps and items of the project and communicate them.

Regards and we hope you understand
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department

Quote from: Crypto-Info on November 22, 2019, 06:48:57 AM

Please don't hide with a nickname behind one forum on the internet. You have nothing to fear to give your name and your face to the community you say you represent, and the company you accuse as a scam and many other things.

Blue Hill Mining chose this forum Bitcointalk.org knowingly, with the understanding that nicknames are used. You seem upset with their choice.
For similar reasons, I too with the full knowledge of being behind an alias chose this site to voice what I like within the boundaries of the rules of course.
So next time Mr bluehillfoundation.sup before being hypocritical try and understand the medium to which you post - anonymous.

We would like to know your name if you are so kind, so we can literally talk to you and not to a nickname, first of all, as we don't know who is the person behind the screen but you can now every person behind this screen. We have invited you to come, we have answered all your questions, we have explained all the details you have asked, we have accepted the ones that were mistaken from us and the ones that are mistakes from your interpretation, and we have settled the formal invitation for you to come to see the interpretation issues from your side with our lawyers that can kindly explain you all the different points that you can't understand at this time.

It is not me for you to convince, it is the community that are also behind nicknames that want answers, thats why you post on here - for the community to see. It makes sense for a public discussion to take place since Blue Hill Mining initiated the first post. I do not need to speak to a lawyer, this is for Blue Hill Mining to prove.
I have no interest in listening about how this scam is run by these fictitious lawyers you talk about. I just pointed out, amongst other Bitcointalk users how this is a scam. In fact I wasn't the first to post about this scam, I however did give credit to them. Remember, you chose to respond to me and picked me as a "community leader", so if you don't like you decision....

For obvious reasons and keeping the professional care of everyone, they won't sit to explain in a forum to a nickname, something that must be explained in-person to a man. And you have rejected that invitation. But for now, we will answer to your different accusations of this post, and to everyone here to see what you can achieve by talking without knowing:

1- We don't ask you to invest, we don't want people who can't understand the project to invest on it as it may be risky for their low understanding level of a high industry business process. You clearly don't have the amount and deepness of knowledge necessary to give this evaluation as you support your accusations in personal appreciations and personal interpretations of the information, even from our answers; what makes you lose total credibility and authority as respect from the well-understood businessmen.

I assume you are saying the Blue Hill lawyers won't explain anything to someone with a nickname and it must be done face to face.
Thats must suck picking a forum full of people with nicknames and not being able to explain anything. It doesn't make any sense does it. You need to hire new lawyers or a new scam artist, or at the very least pick a forum that has peoples real names if thats important to someone there. This is Blue Hill Minings problem, not mine.

2- We don't have one lawyer, we have a full buffet for this, and you are calling it a lie without even knowing about this. You are setting that our lawyers' service is a scam and/or that they are part of one as you are blaming them on being professionally incapable or negligent. Now your accusations have spread to the buffet itself, besides your accusations to us.

I will make a feast from this buffet, all you can eat! LOL In all seriousness though you have no lawyers. It only takes anyone who is fluent with english to realise grammatical/structural errors with the white-papers and the basic incoherent paragraphs that attempt to explain a business structure that is DIFFERENT to the one you are trying to explain. Any professional would rewrite these.

3- The project is not a scam and you are claiming it scam with "authority" self-given and without any proof. You are one person claiming something that dozens of high business people have applauded and become part of. As you may at least understand, this puts you in a very low position, and we are kindly answering your accusations for the people not to get this opportunity out of their hands by unfolded fears from none-named accusations and interpretations.

You are confusing my authority with fact. I have posted what I am happy about saying for the community to read. You don't have to respond to it, and the community will never know your answers. I feel good either way.

4- You don't know about corporate structure, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about legal structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about documents and bureaucratic structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You are accusing so many people involved, so many companies and so many juridic persons that we are pretty sure you are not professional and formed at all neither in business, law or finances. No one with a little knowledge of these areas would be objecting as you are doing, going again and again in the same already answered questions, and complaining to logical and normal actions of every and each business model from top quality in the world.[/color]

Just in case you don't understand what I have been telling you: The business structure in the Blue Hill Mining white papers are different to the structure you are trying to sell people on here. Period.

THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS FOR YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING TO INVEST IN, PLEASE WE ADVISE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AS IT'S CLEAR THAT EVEN WITH A FULL COMPANY ANSWERING TO YOU AND INVITING YOU TO TALK WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YOU CAN'T DISCERN BETWEEN YOUR REALITY AND THE REALITY, YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND THE REALITY, YOUR INTERPRETATIONS AND THE LEGAL ONES, YOUR IDEA OF SCAM AND A TRUE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY.

KEEP TALKING, AND KEEP GIVIN YOUR OPINIONS AND ACCUSATIONS BUT CRYPTO-INFO DON'T GET MORE INVOLVED THAN THAT AS YOU DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO TAKE AND KEEP AN INVESTING DESITION TO ANY PROJECT OR NEW BUSINESS OF THIS TYPE.

Why do you invite me to see your lawyers if I have a low level of business understanding? Sounds like you need new lawyers. I would definitely pick someone who knew about business before asking them to this meeting. Looks like there is no-one to report back to this forum, oh the nicknames! LOL

Regarding the other doubts that you again have asked, we kindly ask you to go back to your posts and look for our answers, as we have already answered these questions with all the detail you need, and all the time it takes.

Did you post why you and the white-paper lied about the BHM token being regulated? Still waiting for an answer from you about this.

You claim yourself to be the information giver and the information bringer to the community, and to represent the community. Well, we are sorry and we don't want to break your ideas and dreams, but the community is more than 1, 10 or 100 persons giving their opinions, and before and after yours we have dozens of thousands of people of the community being part of this and also claiming the totally opposite opinion of yours, and they are and they aren't consumers; you are not even an active consumer, you are just giving an opinion from outside, without proper knowledge, without authority, without experience and without even giving your name...

Looks like you know more about what I do and about my experience than I do. Thats amazing and with only my nickname! Crazy world we live in today. LOL
If you don't like what I say or overwhelmed with peoples opinions you don't have to reply. I much prefer it this way.
I bring facts to the public forum so community members can make informed decisions.

Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM