Quote from: soopy452000 on February 23, 2014, 11:00:38 AM

Quote from: mrcaesar on February 23, 2014, 09:50:11 AM

Quote from: soopy452000 on February 23, 2014, 09:07:27 AM

Quote from: mrcaesar on February 23, 2014, 08:00:38 AM

what's wrong with networkhashps readings? it's showing 7.7mh. When i'm alone doing 10mh

It will show the calculated hash after sometime mate.

It got to 10.3MH then dropped back to 10.1MH and stuck between 10-10.3MH. I was getting about 1\3 of blocks, so the real network hash should be about 30MH. I think you need to look into this issue.

BTW thanks for the clarifications, maybe you should increase giveaway sums? Maybe 221 doyles instead of 22?

Thank you for the heads up buddy!

surething I will look into this but I did not see this issue earlier , I will try to recreate the scene and test further , thank you for the direction! I thought of taking in to your suggestion on Doyles and Now it's official! Tongue

What do you think about Holmes?

True enough 22 Doyles not much but one can recieve multiples of it with activities that I organize etc, I'm with Sherlock long term my friend , No plans of dumping and killing my own coin!

I've seen this happen to other coins , multiple times and again and again , don't want that to happen to Sherlock!

Thank you very much for being a part of Sherlock and your interest!

Please do forward to me if you have any concerns!
I'm always here.
Success to you!
Soopy

Well, 1 holmes is ok too, I just wanted the author of Sherlock Holmes to be in this coin. Arthur Conan Doyle, Arthur sounds complicated, Conan sounds somewhat brutal, Doyle sounds too soft to me. But any of these is good for the smallest part, it's up to Soopy and community to decide, which one to use. Personally I like Conan most, it sounds more noble to me ^^