Quote from: MostlyGhostly on November 23, 2019, 05:03:11 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on November 19, 2019, 02:11:11 AM

Just a heads up guys, it is not a good Idea to be Holding right now.

Quote

Grin still affords a stronger privacy model than Bitcoin or other non-privacy coins, since amounts are safely encrypted. But Mimblewimble provides a strictly weaker privacy model than Zcash or Monero. This makes it insufficient for many real-world privacy use cases.

https://medium.com/dragonfly-research/breaking-mimblewimble-privacy-model-84bcd67bfe52

This is not FUD, just a heads up. I'm sure the Devs will address the issue if its possible.

I havn't spent any time in looking into this but wanted to give you guys a heads up asap.

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on November 19, 2019, 01:29:47 AM

This is the actual article by the researcher:

https://medium.com/dragonfly-research/breaking-mimblewimble-privacy-model-84bcd67bfe52

I see him laying feces on mimblewimble in that medium article but I see no proof of the statement in the first paragraph. Can it be presented in the form of a proof? I can say that I could unveil sendees and senders in every single monero transaction but what will that account for without a shred of a proof. Disclaimer: Im not buying any of privacy coins. Will only buy when it tanks like 100 times of the current value.

Why don't you try reading the rest of the thread, specifically this post.

Quote from: Hueristic on November 19, 2019, 05:04:39 AM

Here is a rebuttal to the paper.

https://medium.com/p/8063371839b9/responses/show

Sounds good to me, move along nothing to see here.