Quote from: dingdongtobias on November 28, 2019, 08:18:46 AM

no trolling, you have good product no need do this dirty game for get atenttion

Fair enough, and I get your perspective 100%. Now, just for a second, assume I'm correct and put yourself in my shoes:

I strongly believe closed source miners should present accurate numbers. We've always educated miners on how to use e.g. xmrig-proxy to test our CN kernels to make sure we are indeed producing the poolside results.
We have the best ethash kernel as measured by a number of metrics. If you could read GCN assembly, I could e.g. show that we're running X% less valu instructions, chose an original way of structuring and running the kernel to be able to remove other bloat, and more.
Currently, it doesn't matter how good we are. The results on Polaris cards are so cutthroat that +1.5% is a huge number (for Vegas we often have a distinct advantage if you take the time to tune properly, but not always beating 1.5%). So, everyone comparing Polaris miners will see that we're "worse". Farm admins testing miners for 30 mins comes back and says "no no, not better". Then they test poolside with a single rig for 24h, still just getting random results because it's far far far from enough shares to prove anything. I have no problem acknowledging solid work and being beaten, but this... No.

So, imho it's all about if I'm correct or not, and I will wrap up our tester tool today. It's a very bad timing I've been swamped for two days when this exploded, not my intent.

Last, If I'm NOT correct about all this, and for some reason I'm a complete fool that has misinterpreted everything and I'm the only one able to generate these results, I will most definitely issue the necessary apologies to all parties involved and go eat my underwear, then look like a fool for the rest of my life. Simple as that.