Quote from: Steamtyme on December 01, 2019, 06:59:20 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on December 01, 2019, 06:26:07 PM

Actually so does the tman ass feltcher steamtyme. That chipmixer spamming double standards scum bag.

Hey no posting my legal name outside of the investigations thread. Freakin rude man.

Apart from that I guess ~~I'm confused~~... you're confused by a few things. Me and Tman have had very little interactions, apart from recently in a resource thread I'm working on. The most current listing of trust list they've excluded for nearly as long as LoyceV had been tracking it, if not longer didn't really keep track of that.

Drawing very thin lines to connect the dots between ~~your~~ CH's hypothetical situation and this one is hilarious. What TMAN paid for the debt is irrelevant, people/companies buy debt all the time. Then try and collect it, that's how it goes. I'm not going to try and guess what TMAN has going on in his mind, he is flexing what information he feels he has on the accused scammer to collect what is owed to him.

Now is it extortion... you'd have to get a lawyer and judge to figure it out. The thing is there is no threat of harm here. He is simply stating he will forward along the DOX of the alleged scammer to those investigating him and his accused scam. I don't see there being any harm based on the way Dean has responded, and brushed it off. So telling a public citizen information legally sourced about another through a private discussion doesn't seem to cross any lines.

Blackmailing by the way just misses the mark. It would be done privately and would have to be something like this

TMAN: Hey douche saw that 50 BTC transferred to your wallet address you used 5 years ago
Douche: Aww man my bad, fuck don't tell anyone... especially that super smart TOAA dude.
TMAN: Okay you send me 5 BTC, and a pick of you topless with TMAN is cool written in lipstick with eyes dran at your nipples and we have a deal.

Shut up snake, your double standards are clear.

Quote from: Steamtyme on March 23, 2019, 06:14:33 PM

By creating a "tit" for "tat" scenario, Alice can be said to be blackmailing Bob. There is the perceived agreement if you return my property, I will not notify the police. Do something for me and I'll remove the negative consequence of your actions from the table. Now would Alice be punished, charged or sentenced for this - No at least not in my country. Should the police become involved their advice would be to always notify them and file a report even if you've recovered the property.

Rightly so, Alice may not realize that by letting Bob off scott free, she is only setting the predator on a path to the next victim, who may not be so lucky.

But tman saying give me the $650 ( i just purchased for 1 satoshi) or else I dox you or now that I know your address...bla bla

IS NOT a threat nor blackmailing. Not tit for tat at all... stfu

Welcome to your posts being scrutinized daily and CORRECTED whenever I feel like it. Scammer supporter.

Do you have Tman on your trust includes by any chance... are they mutual? how many merits do you scumbags share??

This is clear extortion for financial gain.

LOL at alice the blackmailer/extortionist and TMAN clearly not the blackmailer/extortionist.

Tman has been caught out extorting people before and using the THREAT of red trust to silence whistle blowing on his scamming pals.

Imagine beinga tman assfeltcher just for some chipmixer btc dust. What a pathetic loser you are.

Now that we see you are not just fully retarded and are truly convinced that alice was a blackmailer but rather were just playing the retard to protect your scamming pals as evident clearly now from your latest defense of tmans extortion/blackmail then your posts are going to require a lot more attention so that we can help and educate you young grasshopper.

This post again is not to be confused with ANY KIND OF SUPPORT for the betking guy if he really has a responsibility to pay people out and has not done so. This is purely a clear example of extortion under tman/yogg/lauda/steamtyme and EVERY OTHER DT that did not dispute lauda/tman/yogg/owlcatz claims that CH was extorting and blackmailing lauda by claiming if lauda called him a liar again without producing evidence then he would encourage people to review laudas post history to find out the truth about lauda and see if he himself is a liar.

DT = scum bags that will do or say anything for their own financial gain.

TMAN says... " imagine what would happen if you scammed me" LOL I bet that got him trembling and paying up haha

Tman turning this thread from a LEGAL combined effort to reclaim the funds for everyone INTO tman buying the apparent debts for 1 satoshi each and then extorting the member into paying HIM the funds. LOL.