Then TMAN is clearly guilty of blackmail/extortion.
This is about the DOUBLE STANDARDS employed by DT members here when certain behaviors SUIT THEIR OWN FINANCIAL GAIN or their own purposes.
How much clearer can I make this??
Shouldn't it be in reputation then?
NO because this is a CLEAR guide to blackmail and extortion as defined by DT members for the red trusting of NON DT members.
More examples will be added as they come up.
So in future when people are looking for a guide to see how they (NON DT MEMBERS) are allowed to proceed to if people steal their phone, their btc or are battling against LIES and false accusations, trust abuse or any other thing that happens to them. They will be able to read and judge for themselves their best course of action.
Also this thread is going to be dynamic so IF some DT members say HELL NO alice can tell bob to give back her phone or she will call the cops and anyone casting alice as a blackmailer and extortionist and tries to punish her THEN I WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Then that can be added to the guide.
Now stop being a scammer supporter, double standards excuse provider and generally trying to silence those that want transparent fair rules applied equally to all members. Because if you do not..... READY FOR SOME EXTORTION AND BLACKMAIL ohhhhhhhhh .... then we will be correcting you in public and pointing out every time you do so (when it is on topic relevant and net positive).
Yes in our opinion a member can say to someone that is doing something clearly wrong, stop doing that or else we will voice our opinions that it is wrong and provide observable instances and corroborating evidence to substantiate that opinion. If that is blackmail and extortion for 1 member it must be blackmail and extortion for ALL MEMBERS.
It is NOT trolling'
It is NOT mentally ill
It is not blackmail
It is not extortion.
It is not something you ban people for
It is not something you punish people for.
It is the behavior of people that want transparent and fair standards for all members.
If you can not debunk their central points or demonstrate their opinion is incorrect .....then tough shit if it does not fit with what you want to be (known as) the truth.
Also not to be conflated with I am claiming betking is in the right. He should be paying people any and all monies owed (in our personal opinion) under pressure from any legal means permitted. This is not the point. We believe BOB should be forced to return alices phone by any legal means permitted. This is all irrelevant for the purposes of this thread though. That is for the betking thread. If he owes people money then he should be paying that out to them no question of that.
We need to sort out the double standards FIRST, get the transparent rules that are equally applied to all members. Then all the REAL good guys can get on the same side. Those out for themselves only will soon become visible.