Quote from: theymos on December 02, 2019, 10:01:06 PM

- Not asking was unprofessional.

I agree that OG not discussing this with theymos was a mistake on OG's part, but I doubt it was done out of malice..
I think he could have casually claimed airdrops from all of his keys, not skipping this key, and didn't really think anything of it, but should have consulted theymos about it..

Quote from: theymos on December 02, 2019, 10:01:06 PM

Quote from: eddie13 on December 02, 2019, 05:28:10 PM

I think this is an interesting philosophical question of who has the right to these sorts of miscellaneous fork/airdrop values based on who owns the keys or what is contracted with the contents of the keys..

Ideally, it should be handled explicitly in the agreement, but this agreement predated the concept of forkcoins.

This situation occurred mostly because their was little to no foresight into this evolutionary step of cryptocurrency where fork coins and airdrops exploded out of the middle of nowhere.. With the ever changing world of crypto situations like this are likely to even come up again in the future as things change, especially in relation to long term contracts..

Quote from: theymos on December 02, 2019, 10:01:06 PM

the agreement definitely didn't require it, demanding it now could be perceived as exploiting the political atmosphere here to shake down a counterparty.

It is a slip up but it is being over exploited IMO..

Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 03, 2019, 07:22:52 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 03, 2019, 06:20:23 PM

I find it interesting a lot of the most vocal people here attacking OG Nasty were silent when this exact scenario occurred under Lauda's custody.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4895354.0

It also seems like many of the people who are attacked by Lauda the most are defending OGNasty.

FTFY..
I was just attacked with Red trust by Lauda partially in reference to my postings in this thread.. I deserve a negative rating for speaking my mind and exploring contrary points of logic? I don't think so..
Do you want a diversity of ideas or an echo chamber?

Quote from: PrimeNumber7 on December 03, 2019, 09:15:10 PM

I dont like the idea of myself being subjected to mob justice, so I felt obligated to defend him.

Same here, but see what happens?

As of an hour or so ago last I checked OGNasty is still on theymos's trust list so I don't think this whole thing is as big of a deal as many are trying to make it out to be, or I imagine he would have been removed/excluded..