Quote from: HCP on December 04, 2019, 01:23:19 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on December 02, 2019, 01:55:38 AM

CLEAR guide to red trust for EXTORTION and BLACKMAIL according to SOME DT members.
...
some DT members agree.
...
some DT members agree.
...
~~ALL~~ SOME DT agrees with this and ~~all~~ some confirm the red trust is fine and deserving.
...

Some suggested edits for your OP, so you can maintain your "FACT BASED" qualifications... otherwise, please provide proof that I have agreed with any of those scenarios.

NOTE: Just to clarify, I believe that the fact that I haven't made any statements in support, nor condemnation, with regards to any of the above "scenarios" is not proof of either on my behalf. I just dislike the fact that you're generalising and tarring everyone with the same brush. Even the "Switzerland" (apathetic?) DT members who don't really care for forum politics because #reasons.

You seem a reasonable person and we have no current issue with you specifically nor some of the other DT members. Other than we consider them to be putting their own self preservation above the greater good of the forum.

Whilst we appreciate not openly supporting the CLEAR and UNDENIABLE double standards employed to punish whistle blowers and discourage the truth being widely known, could be claimed as NON SUPPORT

We feel that it is the responsibility of DT members when made AWARE of scamming or double standards to do all in their power to thwart such actions. DT can ONLY FUNCTION with any value at all if people do as they independently feel is correct. So unless they are countering the red tags and excluding the scammers/trust abusers.....well

If a DT were provided with undeniable evidence of scamming and refuse to put red on the scammers account just because they were a fellow DT. Then clearly that is willful endangerment of the rest of the honest members here. Same for CLEAR double standards. Therefore BOTH DT members are unsuitable and untrustworthy to some degree and certainly not suitable for DT which requires strength, honesty and a willingness to become a target.

DT members trying to cast off undeniable evidence of

1. scamming
2. trust abuse
3. Willful and deliberate scam facilitating
4. Double standards

as simply board politics are simple saying. We are too afraid for our own skins to do the right thing.

Rather than say that (which although true is kind of a bit too strong of a punishment for weak people rather than the direct scammers) we will just say they agree.

If they are including those they KNOW are undeniably pushing double standards and scamming other members on to DT. Then they surely can not be permitted to claim they do NOT agree with those deeds.

The only way we would accept their claims they do not agree, is if they clearly state we do not agree but we are too afraid to stand against those pushing double standards and scamming people because they will likely target us next.

Don't take this as a person attack upon you. It is our opinion of ANY DT member that is made well aware of observable independently verifiable instances of scamming, double standards, trust abuse and tries to avoid tackling it under the " don't want to get involved in board politics."