Re: P2PB2B - resolving "scam alerts" and misunderstandings
I think @Lauda the sooner you remove it, the better it will be for you, before I, or anyone else, takes a stand against it..
Nope. Double-standards in forum escrowed forks, and the same is happening yet again here against me. Once you stop being a lying cunt and stop selectively applying your "values" depending on who the target is, then I might consider you to be non-malignant. They would run that sig campaign WITH or WITHOUT escrow. So now they are forced to escrow funds. WHICH one is better?
Again, it's a double standard. They'd scream and shout for the option that can cause less damage, assuming that I was not the one who was asked/was about to help them. 
Their is conflict of interest in your opinion of their scamminess now that you are in business with them..
I'm not in business with anyone. You are lying yet again whilst pretending to try and do good, yet again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯With all the twisting, turning, excuses, and reality called out as lies it is hard to know ... but it looks like it is going down like this...
So just to recap... Lauda's known gang have BULLIED a project to use LAUDA's escrow service? is this correct?
Because someone said this should not have happened then Lauda gave them red trust??
Is this correct? I smell some nice EXTORTION going on here.
So they were being called a scam and getting flack but if they use laudas escrow ( and pay him some funds) they can go ahead??
Are these cliff notes correct? Seems like some " possible" new material for my BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION thread in meta.
Now lauda says if you stop saying things I do not like I may consider you non-malignant.... is this like benign ?? hmmm very tasty.