Quote from: TMAN on December 04, 2019, 07:13:43 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 04, 2019, 07:06:00 PM

If Theymos has a problem I assure you he doesn't need you to speak for him.

I am well aware of that sweetcheeks. check all my other posts, I have been open about OBSERVABLE instances of "tacky" behaviour by the previous sole holder of keys of 500BTC

we are all aware you cant even count to 500 so your voice/words/thoughts are about as valuable as a TOAA/Crypcunt Post.

so as I have said to others, shh.... let the adults talk - I am very interested in the difference of opinion between OGnasty and our dear leader.

Quote from: theymos on December 03, 2019, 08:26:12 PM

"Held bitcoins" in the agreement is ambiguous as to what a "bitcoin" is, but due to the whole context of the agreement, and especially because of the full-reserve requirement, I claim that the most supportable interpretation is that all forkcoins (ie. coins forking from Bitcoin's block chain and calling themselves "Bitcoin") were forum property from the beginning.

Quote from: OgNasty on December 03, 2019, 08:20:02 PM

I'm sure he would have paid the funds to me had I spoken up about it. Just like I would have paid him whatever GBYTE had he spoken up about it.
/thread

If you are well aware of that then why are you simply repeating your selectively edited quotes? Unless the harmed party has a complaint, I really don;t give a shit what your opinion in the matter is, and you are most certainly not an ubiased bystander as you say you have been "quite open" about (read intent on slandering) OGNasty.

Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 04, 2019, 09:10:47 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 04, 2019, 06:53:59 PM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 04, 2019, 07:53:23 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 04, 2019, 06:49:19 AM

The stream of accusations (mind you all by the same people) are not well documented

Well, I think I documented his involvement with the biggest crypto ponzi scheme pretty well. He profited well over BTC1,000 by collecting funds and sending them to a ponzi scheme (pirateat40) and paying out less than the ponzi scheme was paying. When the ponzi scheme went down, his 'reserve' fund of less than 5% or what had been collected was returned to investors. (We don't know exactly how much because he deleted all the posts and won't say).

I'm not 'team lauda' either, btw:
I do not endorse any website in my signature.<--Hey Lauda, That's Bullshit

Unlike you I was there back then and saw it with my own eyes. Trendon Shavers went to prison. Do you really believe if OGNasty was an active and knowledgeable participant in any related crime they would have just overlooked him? You should work for the FBI or the SEC since you have such unique ability to sniff these things out that they seem unable to.

Yeah man, I literally linked an article about Trendon Shavers going to prison in the post you quoted.

OGNasty was offering 8% monthly (obviously not sustainable). He was then sending the money he collected to pireateat who was paying out 1% daily. When pirateat was actually paying, OG would make the 8% payment to people he gave the money to and keep the difference (around BTC500 per month for at least a couple months). When Pirateat stopped, he paid out the 'insurance' ammount which was around 5% of the total invested, far less than the cut he took of the payments. Then when he found out I was digging through the old threads he deleted a bunch of posts. These are facts.

That's a ponzi on top of a ponzi.

Wow, you linked an article. Does the article answer my question why you think you have some special information law enforcement didn't? With those kinds of investigative skills you should be working for big brother, you would love it. You could dig through peoples toilet bowls looking for stray peanuts till your heart's content.