Quote from: gabbie2010 on December 04, 2019, 05:15:38 PM

My preferred bounty hunting campaign is the ones which is escrowed and held by a reputable member of this forum, a hunter will be on a safer side ie the possibility of cheating a hunter if the fund is held by the manager is zero, the decision must be made by the hunter thus by doing so is at the hunter's risk,
its sad to hear touching stories of bounty hunters not being paid after many days and months of promoting a project this is some of the risk involved in bounty campaigns.

Very good consideration. That can minimize the recent drama that often happens where bounty hunters often become victims, it could be because of the allocation that was cut, the delay in distribution, tokens or coins locked, etc. Before joining a bounty, we must also prepare mentally to face such a bitter reality.

Quote from: OasisDre on December 02, 2019, 06:59:54 AM

I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
~

Your bad experience with this type of payment cannot be generalized. I participated in many bounty projects whose distribution was handled by the developer but still gave the bounty manager the full right even though there were a few dramas, yes we know that the market situation was not good, so it could be tolerated.
But never mind, that way you understand that it is one form of risk in joining bounties, right?
My advice, do not make conclusions like that, it really depends on each project, can not be generalized, next time choose a project with more depth, choose a reliable BM, and prepare mentally stronger.