Quote from: TMAN on December 04, 2019, 07:00:35 PM

Quote from: theymos on December 03, 2019, 08:26:12 PM

"Held bitcoins" in the agreement is ambiguous as to what a "bitcoin" is, but due to the whole context of the agreement, and especially because of the full-reserve requirement, I claim that the most supportable interpretation is that all forkcoins (ie. coins forking from Bitcoin's block chain and calling themselves "Bitcoin") were forum property from the beginning.

Quote from: OgNasty on December 03, 2019, 08:20:02 PM

I'm sure he would have paid the funds to me had I spoken up about it. Just like I would have paid him whatever GBYTE had he spoken up about it.
/thread

why is everyone ignoring the actually juicy shit here? not eddie or techcunt or anyone else..

The Dalai Lama and the accused theif are conversing - yet others are trying to confuse the whole thread with shitcunt posts - yes I am talking at you techie...

Very interesting how you decided to selectively edit that quote:

Quote from: theymos on December 03, 2019, 08:26:12 PM

"Held bitcoins" in the agreement is ambiguous as to what a "bitcoin" is, but due to the whole context of the agreement, and especially because of the full-reserve requirement, I claim that the most supportable interpretation is that all forkcoins (ie. coins forking from Bitcoin's block chain and calling themselves "Bitcoin") were forum property from the beginning. (I do not claim this for airdrops.)

If Theymos has a problem I assure you he doesn't need you to speak for him.