You've claimed they didn't issue any "real" subpoenas prior to Oct 31st. You've made blanket statements about that. You were just shown one proving you're wrong and you can try and twist it how you wish but that doesn't change the fact..

Yeah. I'm not going to bother with that "legal" thing again. Not my problem if you didn't comprehend what I was referring to at the time. I will give you that it was a poor choice of word on my part but given the context of the conversation at the time it should be been obvious what I meant anyway.