Good job, you can re-present information already presented. This discussion was always about executive branch subpoenas and their validity. You go ahead and use your topic sliding to call it an "out" if you like. I was very specific because you are extremely predictable and I know you would pull some tertiary bullshit like this out and claim it is proof. You think they are different than "legal subpoenas" anyway, so I am not too worried about your expert criticism no matter how much you and your entourage stroke each other off.
You've claimed they didn't issue any "real" subpoenas prior to Oct 31st. You've made blanket statements about that. You were just shown one proving you're wrong and you can try and twist it how you wish but that doesn't change the fact..
Obviously he was wrong. He just has a pathological inability to admit when he is wrong about something. Its utterly bizarre.
Of course you can't even produce a document even resembling a subpoena from The House regarding impeachment before October 31st 2019.
Such a document was indeed produced:
https://i.imgur.com/TDa6SiS.pngLet's dissect this piece-by-piece:
-document resembling a subpoena ✔
-from The House ✔
-regarding impeachment ✔
-before October 31st 2019 ✔
Now I'm sure TS will say, "Oh but I didn't mean that, I meant this or this," because again, he has this clinical, almost neuropathologically-driven inability to admit when he was wrong.
The whole premise of the conflict to begin with was whether House issued subpoenas served to the executive branch were legitimate or not, but don't let that stop you from jerking each other off in public.
