No, your post does not address the irrefutable points that I made above. HE knew the conditions , HE accepted the conditions, HE fucked up and brought into play the conditions HE knew HE agreed to operate under.
Get it now?
The fact you are calling your
opinion irrefutable is all the proof I need to not discuss this with you any further.
I do not care at all what happens here, I just provided my opinion about a really borderline policy which is shady enough to at least discuss it and make everybody aware of it.
I'm not placing any bets there, period. And that's the last I will say about this topic.
Nice strawman attempt...
Which POINTS do you want to refute ... HE knew the conditions , HE accepted the conditions, HE fucked up and brought into play the conditions HE knew HE agreed to operate under.