Quote from: ene1980 on December 06, 2019, 08:20:15 PM

if he lost that bet the company will keep the amount waged and since he won they are having many excuses and it is not the way things should be, if the site allowed those max bet when he played and won they are liable to pay and it is as simple as that.
I know it is a new site and they need sort these issues if they left out and once more it is the site's fault but i do not agree with the scam accusation if they are willing to sort the issues with anyone who waged and won.

It is nowhere as simple as that.

Yahoo was aware that the max winning is 2000. Despite that he "misclicked" and put in 353 USD. Imagine if you knew beforehand that the site has a bug whereby it will accept the over bets as well as display the X36 winnings. (Which yahoo knew). What stops you from deciding to throw in a bunch of calculated risks to "exploit" the bug ad then later claim to have been wronged??

While, everyone is calmly accepting his "misclick", Nobody is looking at Roobet's viewpoint that "He already knew this would happen". He also has a lot of leverage on the forum because of the Signature campaigns. Despite that, Roobet has paid out the 2000USD. Had there been a strategy to mitigate such exploits, they may as well have simply refunded the bet amount giving an error like, "Sorry, your bet above max amount was unaccceptable".

There is a lot of directions this can go. They have paid out the 2000USD. That should be enough. I don't think he deserves a bug bounty too considering that he was an "insider" to the bug.