I'm hoping that the list of 35 defects will generate some additional system requirements for the 2020 ION white paper. The first 25 are related to the IIP  6 deflationary design for Matlack to provide justification for the depressing design. The last 8 defects are the real important ones that concern how ionomy tacticts in trying to implement ION 2020 into the Ionomy vision/dream. I'm real interested in how chief strategist of Ionomy, Mr. Matlack answers the defects:

4. Matlack's GOAL by deleting and REMOVING competitively competing WORK EFFORT
5. Ionomy unfairness to listen or CONSIDER other ION Improvement Proposals from CRYPTO community

I can sum up the answer to the deflationary IIP design:

The Ionomy investors wisdom joke does NOT believe in need for deflationary ionomy wallet product  

BTW: It shows that your lack of understanding on how a product is properly produced with system requirements that can be used to TEST to insure the product is complete and defect free. It's called QUALITY ASSURANCE

Mr. Korvas, have you now noticed that Mr. altheshort is now using tactics to "Character Assault" on my user and Mr. Matlack to discredit our WORK EFFORT

---

Some ION NEWS to get your Sunday started. Glance at the white paper to watch the product improve...

---

Show your ION community support to input into the ionomy platform design for 2020, add new masternode POS 4.0+ and competitive "mobile" game related requirements and/or helpful information to the new 2020 ION White Paper
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg51446862#msg51446862