Your posts are full of innuendo but isn’t evidence of wrongdoing. I don’t think there is any question that OgN profited from his pirate pass through, or that investors lost money in his pass through. I think of it as similar to a peer to peer lending platform such as prosper — people buy debt issued by the platform that is contingent on a specific loan being repaid by a specific borrower, the platform will collect a fee to service the loan and will profit even if the borrower doesn’t pay.

You might argue it was unethical for OgN to participate in the pirate ponzi in the first place, but there were many other people also participating. You might also argue that OgN violated a bunch of SEC paperwork rules, but so do most things around here. The amount that OgN may have profited was a few thousand dollars, but it might be zero if he invested his own money in pirates ponzi.

I previously thought that your beef with OgN was that he was running a signature campaign for what turned out to be a shady casino as this is when your scrutiny of him started. But it doesn’t look like you have extended those same concerns to yahoo who is running a campaign for an even more shady business that was known to be shady before the campaign started and that has been running for months. You also haven’t extended those standards to any of the people who have positive trust ratings who are participating in the campaign.

I would suggest that you find a contract, implied or explicit that OgN did not keep.